← Product cases
Product DesignAdvancedPremium
Design a New Feature for a Ride-Sharing App
Tests whether you can go from a vague mandate to a scoped, prioritized, measurable feature in a two-sided marketplace.
Interview prompt
Design a new feature for a ride-sharing app (e.g. Uber or Lyft).
What interviewers evaluate
- Do you consider BOTH sides of the marketplace (riders and drivers)?
- Do you anchor on a goal (growth, retention, safety, driver supply) before designing?
- Do you scope to a segment and a specific pain rather than a generic feature?
- Do you weigh marketplace side effects (does helping riders hurt driver supply)?
- Do you define success metrics including guardrails?
A framework to structure your answer
- Clarify the goal - are we optimizing rider growth, retention, safety, driver supply, or margin? Restate it.
- Pick a side & segment - choose rider or driver and a segment; name their acute pain.
- Marketplace check - consider how a change on one side affects the other.
- Solution - design for the pain, with the marketplace interaction in mind.
- Prioritize & sequence - impact vs effort, and what to ship first.
- Metrics - primary metric + guardrails (e.g. don't harm ETA, safety, or driver earnings).
Strong sample answer
Try structuring your own answer first, then reveal a strong worked example.
Common variants
- Design a feature to improve driver retention.
- Design a safety feature for a ride-sharing app.
- How would you reduce rider cancellations?
Pitfalls to avoid
- Designing only for riders and ignoring driver-side effects (or vice versa).
- Picking a feature with no clear goal behind it.
- Ignoring marketplace economics (e.g. price guarantees that destroy margin).
- No rollout sequencing - launching a supply-dependent feature where supply is thin.
- Vanity metrics (feature usage) without business guardrails.
Likely follow-ups
- What breaks if driver supply is unreliable in a market?
- How would you price this to protect margin?
- What's the smallest pilot that would de-risk the idea?
Related cases
Product for Visually Impaired
The classic product-design prompt. Interviewers screen for user empathy and a structured, needs-first approach - not feature brainstorming.
Diagnose a Metric Drop
The most common analytical PM case. They want a structured, hypothesis-driven investigation - not a guess.
Improve a Product You Love
Deceptively open. They're testing product judgment, user empathy, and prioritization - not your taste.